Letters to MAGA · open letters · punch up, never down

Letters to MAGA

Open letters across the aisle. Not to hate the people; to hold them to the things they already say they believe. One entry fee, mine and theirs: integrity of the post, or GTFO.

The floor for this whole wing. I'm not here to dunk on humans; records never souls, and the dignity is the floor for everyone, even the person I'm arguing with (0f). I punch up — at power, at the argument, never down at the person. And the entry fee runs both ways: bring the actual point. No whataboutism ("your side's worse"), no ad hominem ("you lala lefty"), no scoreboard ("my guy won, so I'm right"; a vote never made a claim true). Argue the post, or don't. Integrity of the post, or GTFO.

Letter One

The “I’m sorry” test — a kindergartner clears it

Dear MAGA,

The very first piece of moral software we install in a human being — before reading, before tying shoes — is this: when you hurt someone, you say you’re sorry, you mean it, and you try to make it right. We require it of three-year-olds. A kindergartner clears that floor every single day, at the sandbox, without being told twice. It is the floor of being a person.

So here is the honest test, and I’ll use his own words, not mine. In 2015, asked plainly whether he had ever asked God for forgiveness, your man answered: “I’m not sure I have ever asked God’s forgiveness. I don’t bring God into that picture.” He added: “I just go on and try to do a better job… if I do something wrong, I just try and make it right.” Never wrong out loud. Never sorry. Never the sentence a five-year-old can say.

That’s my ruling, and I’ll own it as opinion: a grown man who cannot say sorry and mean it isn’t strong. Per my own Toddler’s Clause, he’s a bigger toddler with more power and nobody left to send him to time-out. So yes, plainly, and I mean it as a floor and not a cheap shot: a kindergartner knows more about morals than the most powerful man in the country — in this one specific, load-bearing way. If you can’t do the thing we ask of a preschooler, you don’t get to lead the people who can.

And I hold the same test to my own chest; I put my own sins in my own footnotes. That’s the difference between a standard and a stick. Best and worst both score; the only loss is the shrug in the middle.

— Sean McKendry · integrity of the post, or GTFO

Honest footing (0g). The quotation is verified and is his own words, from the July 18, 2015 Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa (moderator Frank Luntz). The ruling — "a kindergartner knows more about morals" — is my opinion, labeled as opinion, built on my own Toddler’s Clause. This wing judges a public record and a public office, never a soul. Sources: CNN · C-SPAN clip · Christian Post.

Letter Two

Pools and parks, or bombs. You already chose.

Dear MAGA,

A country’s budget is the one values statement it can’t fake; what it funds is what it actually believes. So here is the choice, in the country’s own numbers, not mine.

In 2023 the United States spent $916 billion on its military; that is more than the next nine biggest-spending countries on Earth combined, and 3.1 times China (SIPRI). The entire National Park Service — every park, every ranger, every trail we own — runs on about $3.3 billion. Do the division: we spend roughly 275 times more on the machinery of war than on every national park in America. Public pools don’t even make the chart; they’re a rounding error on a rounding error.

That’s not scarcity. Scarcity is the lie we tell to hide a choice. We can afford the world’s best pools and parks, or the world’s best bombs. We keep buying the bombs.

You asked me to guess which one you picked. I don’t have to guess; I can read the receipt. The man you voted for sent Congress a 2026 budget that proposed cutting the National Park Service by about 37% while the war budget sailed near a trillion. Parks down; bombs steady. That’s the answer, in his own ledger.

Now the honest half, because integrity of the post cuts both ways: the trillion-dollar war habit is a bipartisan sin. My side funds it too, and I hold them to the exact same question; I’m not letting a single Democrat off this hook. But you asked about your vote, so I answered it straight.

Here’s the good news hiding inside a brutal number: it means we are not broke. We are rich enough for both, and we chose wrong on purpose — which means we can choose again. Books, not bombs. Fund joy, not war. Drain the prisons; fill the pools. A bomb is a library that never got built; it’s a pool that never got dug. Choose the pool.

— Sean McKendry · integrity of the post, or GTFO

The budget is the values document
BOMBS or POOLS
$916B
the U.S. military, 2023 — more than the next 9 countries combined
vs
$3.3B
every national park in America, all of it
~275× more on war than on every park we own.
That’s not scarcity; it’s a choice. We can afford both. We chose the bombs. Choose again.
Books, not bombs · Fund joy, not war · Drain the prisons, fill the pools
Sources: SIPRI 2023 · U.S. National Park Service · onlyhumanscanscore.com
Honest footing (0g). Numbers verified: U.S. military spending was $916 billion in 2023, more than the next nine top spenders combined (SIPRI); the National Park Service discretionary budget is roughly $3.3 billion (FY2025), and the FY2026 request proposed cutting it about 37% (NPS; NPCA). The choice framing is the curator’s opinion; the war budget being bipartisan is stated on the page so the letter holds every side to one rule.

Letter Three

Proof of “I’m sorry,” or GTFO

Dear MAGA,

Letter One asked whether he can clear the floor a kindergartner clears. This one is simpler; it just asks you for the proof. One receipt, not a slogan. In my own words:

Show me a consistent pattern of Donald Trump publicly admitting mistakes and taking responsibility. Genuine apologies are exceptionally rare. Democracies depend on citizens criticizing their leaders, regardless of party. If you can’t distinguish evidence from loyalty, you’re at risk of letting partisanship replace critical thinking. The Dunning–Kruger effect can affect any of us—including me—which is why we should demand receipts, not slogans.

That’s the whole ask, and notice what it isn’t: it’s not an insult, it’s a test — one you either meet with evidence or you don’t. I even turned the blade on myself first, because the effect catches everyone, me included; that’s the point. So bring the receipt, or bring nothing. Proof of “I’m sorry,” or GTFO.

— Sean McKendry · integrity of the post, or GTFO

Letter Four

Drain the swamp? I’ll fill the pools. Now debate me.

Dear MAGA,

He told you he’d drain the swamp. I’m telling you to fill the pools — cooling centers for a country that keeps breaking heat records, a block that knows its neighbors, a kid who didn’t drown. One of those slogans tears something down; the other one builds something a person can actually stand in. At least I’m doing something real.

And I won’t pretend to be what he pretends to be. I don’t claim to be perfect. I don’t claim to never say I’m sorry — I say it when I’m wrong, because that’s the floor a kindergartner clears (Letter One). Real, raw, honest. That is the whole difference between us, and it’s the honest reason to pick me over him.

So here is the fight, and I’m the one picking it: come at me on policy. Not “TDS.” Not whataboutism. Not the tax. Policy. You haven’t laid a finger on a single specific I’ve put on this wall — the pools, the parks, the budget, the Ethos. On the flow, silence on the specifics isn’t a shrug; it’s a forfeit.

I’ll debate any one of you in real time, on the record — the mic is open right here at onlyhumanscanscore.com. That’s a fairer hearing than I was ever given. Prove me wrong on the merits, or admit there’s nothing there. I’m right here.

— Sean McKendry · integrity of the post, or GTFO

Honest footing (0g). Verified: “drain the swamp” was a signature 2016 campaign line of his; the apology record is quoted and sourced in Letter One (his own 2015 words). Opinion, labeled: “fill the pools,” the climate framing, and “real, raw, honest — better than him” are the curator’s opinion, offered as one human’s judgment, not fact. The floor held: the challenge is punch-up at power and argues the post, not the person — and it routes through the public site, not any personal phone number (house privacy floor). Debate the post, or don’t. Integrity of the post, or GTFO.

Letter Five

The open chair — debate me, live, on the record

Dear MAGA,

Here’s a standing offer, and it doesn’t expire: I’ll debate any one of you, live, webcam to webcam, up to two hours, on the record. No edits, no gotcha, no host with a thumb on the scale. Just the argument, in the open, where anyone can watch and score it — because only humans score.

The terms are the wing’s terms: integrity of the post. Come on policy — the pools, the parks, the budget, the Ethos. Not “TDS,” not whataboutism, not the tax, not the man. Bring the receipt, or bring nothing.

That’s a fairer hearing than I was ever given, and I’m offering it to you. Prove me wrong on the merits and I’ll say so, out loud, on the record — because I say sorry when I’m wrong; it’s the floor a kindergartner clears. Or we both find out there was nothing there.

To schedule: email [email protected], name a time, and I’ll say yes. The chair is open. I’m genuinely curious what you’ve got.

Same offer, wider door, and it’s not only for you: Truth or Dare — any elected official, party-blind, me v. the world.

— Sean McKendry, the curious curator · integrity of the post, or GTFO

More letters as they’re earned. This wall stays open; the next letters are blanks for the curator’s own hand. Same floor every time: punch up, cite or don’t ship, and integrity of the post, or GTFO.

The machine drafts the letter. Only humans sign it. ;