To the least of these goes the price

The law, said plainly: it favors the corporation over the disabled — the immortal entity that cannot suffer is handed more standing than the mortal one who can. He believes the inverse, and that the inverse is the just one: legitimacy is measured at the bottom of the scale, never the top. A statute that shelters a thing which cannot be harmed is spending its force where none is needed; a just law spends it on the one who can least defend against it. It's the Super-Citizen inverted — the Inviolability Test given a budget line — with a scripture spine older than any corporation: whatever you did for the least of these (Matthew 25:40), biblical even to the atheist. And the evidence keeps landing on the same side (prevention beats the cage and the bed both — the receipts), the rare case where mercy and arithmetic agree. 0g: labeled opinion about a structure, never a soul; "the studies" names the standing evidence base, not one named paper. Kin: the inverse law, prisons not pools, fund it, don't jail it. (His coin — "laws favor the corps not the disabled; I believe in the inverse; to the least of these goes the price"; machine's read, refine to his.)