Dollars don't equal speech — so tax the ghosts™

The taxation plank, and the debate he actually wants to have. Put the two corporate demands side by side: should corporations pay more, or should they have more speech? They can't honestly have both. If dollars are speech (the Citizens United premise), then the richest ghosts drown out every living voice — so either money isn't speech, and we can tax it freely, or it is, and money already owns the microphone. He picks the honest side: dollars don't equal speech. His labeled campaign position, stated plainly — the individual liberty tax is zero; only the ghosts pay — and the slogan that follows: every vote for Sean is a vote to tax the ghosts, not the humans. (0g: his opinion / campaign plank, not asserted as settled economics; the dollars-equal-speech debate is a real constitutional tension.) Kin: corporations are ghosts, the Super-Citizen, tax the rich = tax the pools, government can be good. (His coin — machine's read, refine to his.)