The ADA Must Have Teeth
The Americans with Disabilities Act is over thirty years old. It still gets treated like a suggestion by the buildings, the corporations, and the budgets that decide compliance is optional. This isn't about blaming a body for not fitting a world that was never built to fit it — it's about targeting the ones who could build it right and didn't.
The crime we all see first
"The least of these" is the test a society fails loudest and first. How a place treats the people it's easiest to overlook — the ones who need the ramp, the wide doorway, the elevator that actually works — is visible before almost anything else about it. It's the crime everyone can see, if they bother to look at the door instead of the lobby.
The poem
The endorsement test
Whichever party actually endorses this platform gets the vote. Not the party with the right jersey, not the one that talks about disability rights in a press release once a year — the one that actually funds enforcement, actually gives the ADA teeth. Party-blind, same test as every other plank on this site: the record decides, not the label.
One vote, more than one voice
My vote only counts as one — but it carries further than one, because the outreach behind it wasn't built with a team or a budget. Zero staff, zero consultants: a memory for the arguments that matter and a Spotify playlist for the energy to keep building past midnight. The press machine here runs in reverse — one person, one record, findable by anyone who looks — and that's exactly why one vote from this house doesn't stay contained to one vote's worth of reach.
Labeled opinion and platform, aspirational, no party endorsed here as fact — only the standing test stated plainly: earn the vote by fixing the enforcement, not by wearing the right colors.